The imposing figure and paternalistic rule of Jomo Kenyatta gave the Kenyan political system its stability, direction, and essential unity. His importance stemmed from a long history as the spokesman of Kenyan nationalism, his imprisonment by colonial authorities, his organization of Kikuyu and national political movements and, not the least, his commanding personality, which literally dominated Kenyan politics and government. He was the symbol of Kenyan nationhood and in every respect deserved to be considered the “Father of the Nation.”
According to records from the British Museums, Jomo Kenyatta was built-in in the evening of 20 October 1893 at Gatundu village, Primal Republic of kenya at exactly 8pm. Jomo Kenyatta was born Kamau wa Ngengi to parents Ngengi wa Muigai and Wambui in the village of Gatundu, in British Eastward African Colony (at present Kenya), a member of the Kikuyu tribe. He is as well the father of Republic of kenya�s 4th President, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta.
However, Kenyatta�s real date of nascence, onetime in the early to mid-1890s, is unclear, and was unclear even to him, as his parents were almost certainly not literate and no formal birth records of native Africans were kept in Kenya and United kingdom either at that time. His begetter died while Kamau was very young, later which, every bit was the custom, he was adopted by his uncle Ngengi, who too inherited his mother, to become Kamau wa Ngengi.
Kenyatta then left home to become a resident educatee at the Church of Scotland Mission (CSM) at Thogoto, close to Kikuyu Town, virtually 12 miles north-west of Nairobi. In 1912, having completed his mission schoolhouse education, he became an apprentice carpenter. Information technology was effectually this time that he took to wearing a traditional beaded belt known as a �Kenyatta�, a Swahili word which means �low-cal of Kenya�.
In 1922 Kamau adopted the name Jomo (a Kikuyu name meaning �called-for spear�) Kenyatta, and began working for the Nairobi Municipal Council Public Works Department. In 1928 he launched a monthly Kikuyu language paper called Muigwithania (Reconciler), which aimed at uniting all sections of the Kikuyu. In 1929 the KCA (Kikuyu Central Association) sent Kenyatta to London to foyer on its behalf with regards to Kikuyu tribal land affairs. He returned to Kenya on September 24, 1930. He returned to London in 1931 and enrolled in Woodbrooke Quaker College in Birmingham.
Kenya was granted internal cocky-regime on June 1, 1963. Kenyatta, equally leader of KANU, became prime government minister and selected a cabinet that was well balanced ethnically. 5 ministers were Kikuyu, four Luo, 1 Kamba, ane Luhya, one Meru, and 1 came from Coast Region. A European was appointed agronomics minister, and a European and an Asian were fabricated parliamentary secretaries; the speaker of the House of Representatives was a European, and the deputy speaker an Asian. Kenyatta emphasized the necessity of unity of all ethnic and racial groups for the economic betterment of the entire nation, but in October a KANU-inspired effort to merge KANU and KADU was unsuccessful. In early 1964, however, the KADU leadership announced support for a policy of unity, which had priority over indigenous considerations.
In September 1963 a final conference had been held in London to reach agreement on the constitutional issues dividing the various participants. Although KANU’s position in the National Associates had been strengthened by defections from the other parties (bringing the total of KANU-held seats to 23 in the Senate and to 99 in the lower business firm), its representatives were unable to forestall the inclusion of significant regional features in the new Independence Constitution (too known in Kenya as the Majimbo Constitution). Thus, when the country attained independence within the Commonwealth on Dec 12, its governmental organisation was far more decentralized than that in the colonial period.
Kenyatta was a human being of many contradictions. Although detained during the emergency in the 1950s for allegedly managing the Mau Mau coup, his actual connection with the Mau Mau had always been ambiguous, and convincing evidence was never presented to substantiate contact between him and the insurgents. Withal it was he, rather than they, who was recognized in the years leading to independence every bit the leader of Kenya’s struggle for national liberation. As prime minister of the cocky-governing colony, he had worked with British authorities to ensure a shine transition of power and had sought the cooperation of European moderates and African loyalists. Characterized as a nationalist rather than as leader of the Kikuyu, he had attempted to create a unified African political movement. As president of an independent Kenya, he had advanced non-Kikuyu equally his number-ii men � Mboya and Odinga (both Luo) and later, Moi (a Kalenjin).
Kenyatta insisted on maintaining a semblance of national representation at the ministerial level of authorities, simply he put his trust in the Kikuyu “former guard,” a tight coterie of favored ministers and advisers drawn from members of an official family unit related to him by blood, union, or long association, most of them from Kiambu. He resisted ideologically motivated solutions. Although he promoted a concept of African socialism, he encouraged Republic of kenya’southward free enterprise economy. In a de facto one-party organization, Republic of kenya’southward political institutions continued to develop forth autonomous lines.
Kenyatta was basically a cautious conservative, a pragmatist who sought to ensure a balance in his policies and the advent of balance in the composition of his authorities. Especially in the early years of his regime, he rarely announced a determination without first verifying that it had pop bankroll; when necessary he appealed to the Kenyan people in mass rallies against opposition politicians. Although successful throughout his career in molding public opinion, Kenyatta was confident enough of his position in later on years to insist on pushing through a detail policy “whether people similar it or not.”
Because of his personal prestige, broad public back up, control of the party appliance, and control of the powers of government, his regime was able to withstand indigenous and ideological pressures building up in the country and mounting criticism of abuse in official circles.
Government functioned at 2 levels: the start, the formal government construction; the second, the inner circle of mainly Kiambu old guard who surrounded the president. It was among this latter grouping that decisions were made and presented to the formal authorities for implementation. In 1974 it included holders of five of the 9 almost important ministries and several potential rivals for the future leadership of the state.
Some were connected with the Gikuyu [Kikuyu]-Embu-Meru Association (GEMA), which administered the harambee (literally, let us all pull together) plan for social welfare and development amid the Kikuyu. Equally an arrangement it was likewise dedicated to keeping political power in Kikuyu easily. Amidst the most influential were Njoroge Mungai, Kenyatta’s personal physician and foreign min ister from 1969 until his defeat in parliamentary elections in 1974; Oxford-educated Eliud W. Mathu; and Mbiyu Koinange, a Kiambu traditionalist who was government minister of land in the Part of the President and Kenyatta’s brother-in-law. Kenyatta’s youngest wife, Mama Ngina, a keen businesswoman and his closest adviser outside the government, reputedly controlled political patronage.
Kenyatta’s exact age was unknown, although he was more often than not believed to have been born about 1890. In poor health, he withdrew more and more from the everyday routine of government in Nairobi later 1969, dividing his time between his family subcontract at Gatundu and the provincial country houses at Nakuru and Mombasa, which became Kenya’s executive capitals and centers of political intrigue when the president was in residence. From these locations Kenyatta maintained absolute control of the country’s political mechanism. Increasingly shielded by his inner circle of advisers, yet, the president became remote from public stance, particularly regarding the growing resentment of corruption in high places, but he could still be a powerful force in forming information technology.
There was no prime minister, and the president acted every bit his ain head of government. During his extended absences from Nairobi, the cabinet seldom met as a collective trunk. The National Assembly remained an arena for conflict solution, where policies handed downwardly by the regime were vigorously debated and so invariably approved, but Kenyatta referred to its deliberations as “a kind of theater.”
Moi, the only non-Kikuyu close to the heart of ability, assumed responsibility for much of the mean solar day-to-day conduct of government and represented Kenya in negotiations with foreign leaders. In 1975 Kenyatta was elected to his third term as president. As his health farther weakened, the question of succession became uppermost in the concerns of the former guard, who were determined to preserve their influence in the post-Kenyatta era. The Kiambu core, which included top civil servants and senior military officers, as well as prominent politicians, tried to agree on a Kikuyu candidate, but they remained disunited themselves. Moi’s high stock with Kenyatta only served to widen the split in their ranks.
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing listing
Jomo Kenyatta Caused Discontent During His Rule in Kenya by