Social Isolation Peaks in _____ and Late Adulthood

Social Isolation Peaks in _____ and Late Adulthood

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Wellness Intendance System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

Summary

Social isolation (the objective state of having few social relationships or infrequent social contact with others) and loneliness (a subjective feeling of being isolated) are serious yet underappreciated public wellness risks that touch a significant portion of the older adult population. Approximately one-quarter (24 pct) of customs-dwelling Americans aged 65 and older are considered to exist socially isolated, and a significant proportion of adults in the United states report feeling lonely (35 percent of adults anile 45 and older and 43 percent of adults anile lx and older). While there are challenges in measuring social isolation and loneliness precisely, there is strong prove that many older adults are socially isolated or solitary in means that puts their health at hazard. For instance:

  • Social isolation has been associated with a significantly increased chance of premature bloodshed from all causes;
  • Social isolation has been associated with an approximately 50 percent increased adventure of developing dementia;
  • Loneliness among heart failure patients has been associated with a about four times increased run a risk of expiry, 68 percent increased take a chance of hospitalization, and 57 per centum increased run a risk of emergency department visits; and
  • Poor social relationships (characterized past social isolation or loneliness) have been associated with a 29 percent increased risk of incident coronary heart disease and a 32 percentage increased risk of stroke.

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Intendance System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

Understanding the total scope and complexity of the influence of social relationships on health is challenging. In addition to the absolute number or extent of social relationships, the quality of such relationships is also an important gene in their impact on health. Ii aspects of social relationships, social isolation and loneliness, have become increasingly prominent in the scientific literature. While both social isolation and loneliness can affect health throughout the life course, this written report focuses on the health impacts of social isolation and loneliness amidst adults aged 50 and older. Of note, it is incorrect to assume that all older adults are isolated or solitary or that aging, independent of other factors, causes social isolation and loneliness. Rather, older adults are at increased risk for social isolation and loneliness because they are more likely to confront predisposing factors such equally living alone, the loss of family or friends, chronic disease, and sensory impairments. Over a life grade, social isolation and loneliness may exist episodic or chronic, depending on an private’southward circumstances and perceptions.

Many approaches take been taken to improve social connections for individuals who are socially isolated or solitary, only opportunities to arbitrate may be most challenging for those who are at highest risk. For example, people who do not take consistent interactions with others (e.g., have unstable housing, do non belong to whatever social or religious groups, or practise not accept significant personal relationships) may never be identified in their own communities. Withal, about all persons 50 years of age or older interact with the health care system in some style. Therefore, this report focuses on the role of the health intendance system as a fundamental and relatively untapped partner in efforts to place, prevent, and mitigate the adverse health impacts of social isolation and loneliness in older adults.

STUDY CONTEXT AND Accuse

A systematic and rigorous scientific discipline of social relationships and their consequences, especially in terms of health, emerged in the latter part of the 20th century as part of a broader recognition of the part of social determinants of health. By the beginning of the 21st century, several aspects of social relationships were being studied systematically in research and had been identified as potential influences on human health. Only recently have the adverse wellness effects of social isolation and loneliness received public attention nationally and internationally. For example, in January 2018, Theresa May, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, established and appointed a Government minister of Loneliness to develop policies for both measuring and reducing loneliness.

With back up from the AARP Foundation, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies) formed the Committee on the Health and Medical Dimensions of Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults in autumn 2018. The committee’s charge essentially consisted of

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

2 parts. First, the committee was charged with summarizing the show for how social isolation and loneliness affect health and quality of life in adults aged 50 and older, particularly amidst low-income, underserved, and vulnerable subpopulations (groups the commission refer to equally “at-chance” populations). Second, the committee was charged with identifying and recommending opportunities specifically for clinical settings of health care to help reduce the incidence and agin health impacts of social isolation and loneliness (such every bit clinical tools and methodologies, professional instruction, and public awareness) and to examine avenues for the broadcasting of information targeted to wellness care practitioners.i

While this report focuses on the function of the wellness care organization, the committee emphasizes that the health care system solitary cannot solve all of the challenges of social isolation and loneliness; rather, the wellness intendance organization needs to connect with the broader public wellness and social care communities. Furthermore, the commission recognizes that in the larger context of addressing social isolation and loneliness, the most effective interventions may not require the participation of the health care system. However, this does not mean that the health care system should not strive to aid amend the wellness and well-being of those who endure the adverse health impacts of social isolation and loneliness. In fact, health care providers may be in the best position to place individuals who are at highest risk for social isolation or loneliness—individuals for whom the health care system may be their only signal of contact with their broader customs. In this way, the health care organization can assistance those individuals to connect with the most appropriate care, either inside or outside the wellness care system. Therefore, the health care system has the potential to be a disquisitional component of a much larger solution.

DEFINING ASPECTS OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

The broad, interdisciplinary scientific fields that together form the modern science of social relationships have used a variety of terms—social isolation, social connection, social networks, social support, social relationships, loneliness, and so forth—to refer to related situations. There are important distinctions among these terms in what they draw or measure, just they are often erroneously used interchangeably. An individual can be isolated and not feel lonely, or tin can feel lonely fifty-fifty if he or she is not isolated. Social isolation and loneliness stand for distinct phenomena.
Social isolation
typically refers to the objective lack of (or limited) social contact with others and is marked by a person having few social network ties, having infrequent social contact, or, potentially, living lone.

___________________

1
The complete Statement of Task is presented in Chapter ane of this written report.

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering science, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Printing. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×


Effigy S-ane
Social connectedness as a multifactorial construct including structural, functional, and quality components.
SOURCE: Holt-Lunstad, 2018a. Reproduced with permission from the
Annual Review of Psychology, Book 69 © 2018 past Annual Reviews, http://www.annualreviews.org (accessed March 13, 2020).


Loneliness, past contrast, refers to the perception of social isolation or the subjective feeling of beingness lonely. Although those who lack social contact may experience solitary, social isolation and loneliness ofttimes are non significantly correlated. Thus, it is important to distinguish between the 2 states.

The term “social relationships” is arguably the virtually common way of referring to the connections and intersections among human beings, and information technology derives from and is employed in broader common usage. In 1979 Berkman and Syme documented the strong association between social relationships and all-crusade bloodshed and, hence, life expectancy, using the terms “social networks” and “social integration” to denote a broad pattern of social relationships (with both individuals and groups). Additionally, there has been much inquiry on the concept of
social support, the actual or perceived availability of resource from others. Over the by several decades at that place has been a new focus on loneliness as a chance factor for health. While each of these terms have been linked to important health outcomes, they are non highly correlated, suggesting that they may influence health through different mechanisms. Thus, the term “social connection” has been proposed to encompass the unlike conceptual and measurement approaches (encounter Effigy S-1). Social isolation is reflected in Figure S-1 as a structural indicator of social connection while loneliness is functional indicator.

Popular:   Which Appeal is the Best Example of Pathos

The literature apropos social isolation and loneliness uses all of these terms. To depict the evidence base as accurately every bit possible, when the evidence does not differentiate among or combines several related terms, this report uses

Suggested Commendation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Applied science, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

the term “social connection” to refer to the various structural, functional, and quality aspects of social relationships. This study uses the specific terms “social isolation,” “loneliness,” or other terms when the data are specific to these terms.two

GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The commission formulated its recommendations in accordance with five goals, each of which addresses an attribute of enhancing the function of the health care system in addressing the health impacts of social isolation and loneliness in older adults (come across Box Due south-1). While not all of the recommendations are explicitly directed to clinicians or clinical settings of intendance, the committee identified recommendations that would be most helpful to accomplish the ultimate goal of developing and improving clinical interventions to mitigate the negative wellness impacts of social isolation and loneliness. Furthermore, the committee emphasizes that the preservation of an individual’s own decisions regarding his or her life is essential as a guiding principle for all interventions. The following sections talk over the overall goals and recommendations of this report, all of which utilize to interventions in health care settings for adults anile 50 and older.

___________________

two
While social integration can describe high social connection, low scores on measures of social integration (e.g., on the Berkman–Syme Social Network Index) are frequently used as an indication of social isolation. Thus, the term “social isolation” volition also exist used to stand for these information.

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Printing. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

Goal 1: Develop a More Robust Prove Base

While a substantial and growing trunk of evidence demonstrates the wellness impacts of social isolation and loneliness, the evidence base of operations for interventions for specific populations or settings is less robust. Recommendations are provided for coming together the goal of developing a more robust evidence base of operations on effective assessment, prevention, and intervention strategies.

Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Mortality

Social isolation and loneliness are as prevalent and play as big a role in today’s order as many other well-established gamble factors for health, withal express resource and attention have been committed to better agreement social isolation and loneliness and their individual and collective impacts on health. More than than four decades of enquiry has produced robust bear witness that defective social connexion—and, specially, scoring high on measures of social isolation—is associated with a significantly increased risk for premature bloodshed from all causes. Furthermore, in that location is some evidence that the magnitude of the effect of social connection on risk for bloodshed may be comparable to or greater than other well-established take a chance factors that are widely recognized and acted on past the public health and health care systems.

While there is prove that loneliness is associated with mortality, the existing evidence does non nonetheless arroyo the cumulative weight of evidence for the association between social isolation and bloodshed. More enquiry is needed to establish the strength and robustness of the predictive association of loneliness with mortality in relation to social isolation and to clarify how social isolation and loneliness relate to and operate with each other.

RECOMMENDATION 2-1: Major funders of health research, including the government (e.g., the National Institutes of Health, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Constitute), foundations, and big health plans should fund enquiry on social isolation and loneliness at levels that reflect their associations with mortality.3

Risk Factors and Health Impacts

The relationships among risk factors, social isolation or loneliness, and health impacts tin can be reciprocal in that not only can being socially isolated or solitary accept an impact on health, but the resultant health conditions can increase an

___________________

3
The committee’s recommendations are numbered according to the affiliate of the main report in which they appear. Thus, Recommendation 2-1 is the beginning recommendation in Chapter two.

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Applied science, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Intendance Organization. Washington, DC: The National Academies Printing. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

individual’s likelihood of experiencing social isolation or loneliness. Furthermore, some factors may increase the risk for social isolation and loneliness (and ultimately, event in negative health impacts) while other factors may provide protective benefits. Substantial evidence indicates that social isolation, loneliness, and other indicators of social connection have associations with major forms of concrete, cerebral, and psychological morbidity; health-related behaviors; and health-related quality of life. However, the evidence for specific impacts in the at-risk populations is sparse.

Beyond these associations, the mechanisms by which social connection, or lack thereof, affects the development and grade of illness have been elucidated by a growing bear witness base. Stiff evidence links social isolation, loneliness, and other indicators of social connection to changes in biological and behavioral responses which may in turn influence health risk. Thus, current evidence supports plausible biological and behavioral mechanisms that explicate how social isolation and loneliness ultimately influence wellness outcomes.

The commission identified the increased funding of bones enquiry equally key to developing a more than robust evidence base on constructive assessment, prevention, and intervention strategies for social isolation and loneliness (Goal 1). Specifically, the committee ended that identifying, prioritizing, and developing means to interpret scientific knowledge about the impacts of social isolation and loneliness on health into effective and efficient clinical and public health interventions first requires a better understanding of how social isolation and loneliness are connected with each other and how they impact health. This includes agreement the mechanisms through which social isolation and loneliness touch on health, the risk factors for social isolation and loneliness, and the factors that bear upon those relationships.

RECOMMENDATION iii-1: Major funders of health research, including the authorities (e.chiliad., the National Institutes of Health, the Middle for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Inquiry Institute), foundations, and large health plans should fund research to meliorate the basic scientific understanding of the links between social connectedness and health, including the study of risk factors and mechanisms.

The Current Evidence Base for Interventions

The overall quality of the evidence for specific clinical and public health interventions for social isolation and loneliness in older adults is mixed. In part, this is due to the heterogeneity of older people themselves and the underlying causes of their isolation or loneliness. While at that place is some evidence for promising approaches, the committee concludes that researchers are merely get-go to understand which specific approaches work best for which populations and which adventure factors. In particular, the committee emphasizes that unlike intervention

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Wellness Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

approaches may exist needed for social isolation versus loneliness. Furthermore, in the case of technological interventions, many gaps in agreement remain, particularly related to possible unintended harms and ethical concerns as well as the impact of current trends, such as the use of social media on future generations of older adults.

The committee identified three major aspects of the evidence base for effective clinical and public wellness interventions that need to be addressed in order to decide best practices and approaches: quality, funding, and research gaps. That is, the overall quality of the evidence base needs to be improved, acceptable funding of research will be required, and enquiry on major gaps in the electric current evidence base needs to be prioritized. Therefore, the committee makes the post-obit recommendations:

RECOMMENDATION 9-3: Funders should prioritize research that builds a scientific foundation for clinical and public health interventions that reduce the wellness and medical impacts of social isolation and loneliness based on standard theoretical frameworks. Researchers and health intendance providers and systems that report interventions for social isolation or loneliness should consider the post-obit fundamental elements in the design and evaluation of any intervention in society to enhance the ability to compare beyond studies:

  • A theoretical framework that drives particular approaches
  • Appropriate choice of measure
  • A specific target population
  • Scalability
  • Sustainability
  • Ways to encourage data sharing
Popular:   When You Apply the Ipde Process You May Decide to

RECOMMENDATION 9-4: Major funders of health research, including the government (e.thousand., the National Institutes of Health, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Enquiry Institute), foundations, and large health plans should fund research on interventions in clinical settings to identify, forbid, and mitigate the effects of social isolation and loneliness in older adults.

RECOMMENDATION 9-5: Those who fund, develop, and operate programs to assess, prevent, and arbitrate in social isolation and loneliness should prioritize inquiry on the following major gaps in the bear witness base of operations:

  • Tailored interventions based on a public health framework of primary, secondary, and third prevention. In item, researchers should examine improved measures to identify individuals who may be at

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering science, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care Organisation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: ten.17226/25663.

×


  • high risk for social isolation or loneliness and primary interventions in order to target such individuals.

  • Trends among current younger adults as they historic period (eastward.g., apply of technology, economic trends) to gain knowledge that informs hereafter approaches to addressing social isolation and loneliness.
  • Flexibility in funding to allow for the airplane pilot testing and evaluation of innovative funding mechanisms for interventions.
  • Approaches for assessments of and interventions among understudied groups of older adults (due east.g., depression income, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) and those who confront unique barriers to health.

RECOMMENDATION 9-6: Organization designers equally well equally those who are developing and deploying engineering science in interventions should ensure that technological innovations related to social isolation and loneliness are properly assessed and tested so equally to sympathise their full range of benefits and potential adverse consequences in order to prevent damage, and they should piece of work to empathise and have into account contextual issues, such as broadband access and having sufficient knowledge and support for using the technology.

Goal two: Translate Current Research into Wellness Intendance Practices

Older adults are loftier-volume and loftier-frequency users of the wellness care organization. Targeting the major social and behavioral take a chance factors for health offers a way to improve population health and even reduce health disparities. Health care delivery systems are exploring the feasibility and touch on of using do-based strategies to place and address the social determinants of health, including social isolation and loneliness. Many intervention efforts for social isolation and loneliness focus only on customs-based organizations, just given the evidence for the broad-reaching impacts of social isolation and loneliness on the health of older adults and the emerging evidence for their impacts on wellness care utilization, the commission concluded that the health care organisation is well poised to develop methods for offset to place social isolation and loneliness in health care settings. By offset identifying those at highest risk, clinicians and wellness care researchers may be able to use these findings to better target meaningful clinical and public health interventions to individual patients as well as to high-demand populations served by a exercise or health care system. Furthermore, this will support a step-wise approach to care that includes the identification of individuals at take chances, the provision of instruction, and ultimately, intervention.

RECOMMENDATION 7-i: Health care providers and practices should periodically perform an assessment using one or more validated tools to place older adults experiencing social isolation and loneliness in club to

Suggested Commendation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering science, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Wellness Care Organization. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: ten.17226/25663.

×


initiate potential preventive interventions subsequently having identified individuals who are at an elevated risk due to life events (e.g., loss of a significant human relationship, geographic move, relevant health conditions).

  • In the example of older adults who are currently socially isolated or alone (or at an elevated risk for social isolation or loneliness), health care providers should talk over the adverse health outcomes associated with social isolation and loneliness with these older adults and their legally appointed representatives. Providers should make appropriate efforts to connect isolated or lonely older adults with needed social care.
  • For older adults who are currently socially isolated or lonely, health intendance providers should attempt to determine the underlying causes and utilise show-based practices tailored to appropriately address those causes (e.chiliad., hearing loss, mobility limitations).

A variety of established enquiry tools can be used to mensurate social isolation and loneliness, each with its ain strengths and weaknesses. Despite the limits of the bear witness base of operations concerning how best to implement these tools in clinical settings, the commission concluded that an of import aspect of selecting a tool for use in clinical settings is standardization. This means that within a specific health intendance system or system, all clinicians should use the aforementioned tool or gear up of tools; they should apply simply validated tools and refrain from using just parts of existing tools or creating new, unvalidated tools. While the committee recognizes that some variation in choice of appropriate tools may be necessary for assessing certain specific populations or health conditions, information technology emphasizes that the chosen measurement tool needs to lucifer the enquiry question. (That is, if assessing for loneliness, for example, the tool needs to be validated specifically for the measurement of loneliness, as opposed to other indicators of social connection.) In spite of limitations to existing tools, their utilise is necessary to address social isolation and loneliness more fully in clinical settings. More effort is needed to update existing tools and to develop and validate better tools that can fully capture the experience of social isolation and loneliness amongst today’s older adults.

Additional inquiry is needed to evaluate the ethical implications and unintended consequences of clinical assessments and as well to decide specific implementation details, including

  • who should receive the assessment,
  • who should bear the assessment,
  • the ideal frequency of assessment for different subpopulations, and
  • the appropriate interventions, referrals, and follow-up care.

Many initiatives to address social isolation and loneliness in clinical settings are existence undertaken past individuals without formal research grooming.

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

Linking clinicians and others who are implementing new interventions with formally trained researchers early on in the design of the intervention can aid to ensure robust research design, and thereby improve the evidence concerning the utilize of validated tools in clinical settings.

RECOMMENDATION vii-ii: Health care systems should create opportunities for clinicians to partner with researchers to evaluate the application of currently available show-based tools to assess social isolation and loneliness in clinical settings, including testing and applications for specific populations.

Finally, the committee concludes that assessment information demand to be included in clear locations in the electronic health tape.

RECOMMENDATION 7-3: The committee endorses the recommendation of previous National Academies reports that social isolation should exist included in the electronic health record or medical tape.

Enquiry will be needed to determine how to best integrate information from a patient’s assessments into his or her health record in order to make determinations about time to come care and the identification of risk.

Goals 3 and 4: Meliorate Awareness and Strengthen Ongoing Education and Training

Educating and grooming the wellness intendance workforce almost addressing social isolation and loneliness will crave a broad approach like to educating the workforce to address the social determinants of health. Workforce development is needed within formal degree and postgraduate programs for health professionals, in training programs for direct care workers and customs members, and in lifelong learning opportunities. Information technology will be necessary to educate and railroad train all members of the health care workforce, including professionals, direct care workers, customs health workers, volunteers, family caregivers, and members of the larger community, such as police officers and mail carriers, who provide a broad array of services to or regularly interact with older adults.iv

Improving Overall Awareness

Based on the significant evidence base of operations concerning the wellness and medical impacts of social isolation and loneliness, the committee concluded that, equally with

___________________

iv
This written report focuses on the didactics and training of wellness intendance workers, peculiarly health care professionals and straight care workers.

Popular:   Which Claim Do Both Passages Support

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

other public health issues of the same magnitude, a critical pace toward preventing, mitigating, or eliminating negative wellness impacts will exist to improve awareness amid the general public and, specifically for this report, amongst the wellness care workforce itself.

RECOMMENDATION 8-one: The U.S. Section of Health and Human Services should abet for including measures of social isolation and loneliness in major large-scale wellness strategies (due east.1000., Healthy People) and surveys (e.g., National Health Interview Survey).

RECOMMENDATION viii-2: Health and aging organizations, relevant government agencies, and consumer-facing organizations should create public awareness and education campaigns that highlight the health impacts of social isolation and loneliness in adults.

  • Wellness care systems, associations representing all types of wellness care workers (e.one thousand., American Medical Clan, American Nurses Clan, American Psychological Association, National Clan of Social Workers, American Geriatrics Society, American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, organizations representing direct care workers); wellness-related organizations (due east.k., American Middle Clan); consumer-facing, wellness-related organizations (e.yard., AARP); aging professional associations (eastward.chiliad., American Society on Aging, Gerontological Guild of America); aging services organizations (e.g., area agencies on aging, country departments on aging); and organizations working with at-risk older adults (e.grand., National Hispanic Quango on Aging) should actively communicate information about the health impacts of social isolation and loneliness through print and digital media.
  • Organizations representing health plans and providers should include consumer-friendly information well-nigh the health impacts of social isolation and loneliness in their repository of patient resources (e.1000., where the arrangement provides data about the self-direction of various chronic diseases).

Strengthening Pedagogy and Training

While enquiry-based evidence is not still available to support curricular content on specific interventions for social isolation and loneliness in older adults, enough is known virtually the wellness impacts to warrant wide curricular recommendations for all health professions and careers. Pedagogy is needed virtually the prevalence of social isolation and loneliness in older adults, the health outcomes and take a chance factors for social isolation and loneliness, and how to assess

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Wellness Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

for these problems. Health professionals also need to acquire how to work directly with older adults and their significant others to support and encourage means to prevent or reduce social isolation and loneliness, including how to brand and follow-up on referrals to appropriate customs-based services. This volition include learning to piece of work with direct care workers, community health workers, family caregivers, and other community members as role of a team-based arroyo to helping older adults. Wellness intendance professionals also need to learn how to work with customs partners to develop, implement, and evaluate programs for preventing or mitigating social isolation and loneliness in older adults. Competency in each of these areas will get increasingly of import as systems of care are developed for preventing, assessing, and treating the negative health impacts of social isolation and loneliness in older adults. Therefore, as a start step, the committee makes the following recommendations:

RECOMMENDATION 8-three: Health professions schools and colleges as well as direct care worker grooming programs should include education and grooming related to social isolation and loneliness in their curricula, optimally as interprofessional team-based learning experiences.

  • Health education and preparation programs should include data on clinical approaches to assessing and intervening when an older developed is at chance for social isolation and loneliness.
  • As evidence on effective interventions develops, wellness educational activity and training programs should provide didactics on integrating care related to social isolation and loneliness into clinical practice and as part of discharge planning, care coordination, and transitional intendance planning with community organizations.

RECOMMENDATION 8-4: Health professional associations should contain information about the health and medical impacts of social isolation and loneliness on older adults in their advocacy, practice, and pedagogy initiatives.

  • Health professional associations should include social isolation and loneliness in conference programming, webinars, toolkits, clinical guidelines, and advancement priorities.

RECOMMENDATION 8-5: Health professional associations, membership organizations, academic institutions, health insurers, researchers, developers of pedagogy and training programs, and other actors in the public and private sectors should support, develop, and test different educational and training approaches related to the health and medical impacts of social isolation and loneliness in older adults across dissimilar segments of the

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Intendance Organization. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×


health intendance workforce (including health care professionals and direct care workers) in order to determine the most effective ways to enhance competencies. In addition to initial clinical pedagogy, these approaches should apply to professional instruction, standing education modules, online learning, and other forms of lifelong learning.

Depending on the complexity of the noesis to be disseminated or the evidence-based practices to be implemented, a diverseness of education strategies can be considered. As the evidence for interventions evolves, the educational and training opportunities demand to aggrandize to include new and updated evidence-based practices for preventing, assessing, and treating the negative health impacts of social isolation and loneliness.

Goal 5: Strengthen Ties Betwixt the Health Intendance Organization and Customs-Based Networks and Resources

Like other social determinants of health, social isolation and loneliness are customs-broad problems and some solutions will require coordinated solutions between the health care system and community-based social care providers. National, state, and local coalitions of public and individual wellness care leaders, including minority-based community organizations, need to piece of work collectively to develop strategies to address social isolation and loneliness in older adults.

RECOMMENDATION 9-1: Wellness care providers, organizations, and systems should partner with social service providers, including those serving vulnerable communities, in order to create effective squad-based care (which includes services such equally transportation and housing support) and to promote the use of tailored customs-based services to address social isolation and loneliness in older adults.

Many wellness intendance organizations (eastward.chiliad., hospitals) are required under federal police force to submit customs benefit reports. Efforts by such entities to partner with social service providers could be used equally an instance of their community benefit. The 2019 National Academies consensus study written report
Integrating Social Care into the Delivery of Health Care
cites the provision of transportation vouchers and the investment in community ride-sharing programs as examples of activities that tin improve the integration of care. Such services could permit individuals to travel to health care appointments and to overcome private transportation-related barriers to being more than integrated into local customs events, both of which could help to reduce social isolation and loneliness.

A diversity of stakeholders, both within and exterior of the formal health care arrangement, are testing new approaches to preventing, identifying, and intervening in social isolation or loneliness for older adults. The committee concluded that as

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering science, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: x.17226/25663.

×

new evidence develops, a centralized sharing of resources and best practices would benefit all stakeholders.

RECOMMENDATION nine-2: Given the public health impact of social isolation and loneliness, the U.S. Department of Wellness and Human Services should establish and fund a national resources eye to centralize prove, resources, training, and best practices on social isolation and loneliness, including those for older adults and for diverse and at-take chances populations.

Broadcasting AND IMPLEMENTATION

The dissemination and implementation of evidence into regular and effective employ is circuitous because of the multiplicity and varying capacities of health intendance systems and providers and the multifariousness of the target audiences. However, such efforts are imperative in order to improve quality of intendance, outcomes, and population health. Two master challenges exist for the dissemination and implementation of evidence related to the social isolation and loneliness of older adults. First, ameliorate dissemination is needed of the evidence of the wellness impacts. 2nd, the best practices of implementation science need to be used in social club to ensure that health care systems and providers are able to more speedily prefer evidence-based practices. This will be peculiarly important equally the evidence base on the effectiveness of specific interventions improves.

Suggested Citation:“Summary.” National Academies of Sciences, Technology, and Medicine. 2020.
Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25663.

×

This folio intentionally left blank.

Social Isolation Peaks in _____ and Late Adulthood

Source: https://www.nap.edu/read/25663/chapter/2