Explain the Concept of Withdrawal as It Relates to Medication

Explain the Concept of Withdrawal as It Relates to Medication

Chapter i provides a cursory historical overview of changes in the perceptions and provision of detoxification services. It also introduces the cadre concepts of the detoxification field, discusses the primary goals of detoxification services, clarifies the stardom between detoxification and treatment, and highlights some of the broader issues involved with providing detoxification inside systems of care.

Purpose of the TIP

This TIP is a revision of TIP nineteen,
Detoxification From Booze and Other Drugs
(Heart for Substance Corruption Handling [CSAT] 1995d). Significant changes in the area of detoxification services since the publication of TIP 19 include

Refinement of patient placement procedures

Increased knowledge of the physiology of withdrawal

Pharmacological advances in the management of withdrawal

Changes in the role of detoxification in the continuum of services for patients with substance apply disorders, and new issues in the direction of detoxification services within comprehensive systems of intendance

Emerging issues regarding specific populations (east.g., women, cultural minorities, adolescents)

This TIP provides clinicians with upwards-to-date data in these areas. It also expands on the administrative, legal, and ethical bug commonly encountered in the delivery of detoxification services and suggests performance measures for detoxification programs. Like its predecessor, this TIP was created by a panel of experts with diverse feel in detoxification services—physicians, psychologists, counselors, nurses, and social workers, all with item expertise to share.


The primary audiences for this TIP include substance corruption treatment counselors; administrators of detoxification programs; Unmarried State Agency directors; psychiatrists and other physicians working in the field; primary care providers such every bit physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, psychologists, and other clinical staff members; staff of managed care and insurance carriers; policymakers; and others involved in planning, evaluating, and delivering services for detoxifying patients from substances of corruption. Secondary audiences include public safety/police and criminal justice personnel, educational institutions, those involved with assisting workers (east.thousand., Employee Assist Programs), shelters/feeding programs, and managed care organizations. The TIP besides should evidence useful to providers of other services in comprehensive systems of care (vocational counseling, occupational therapy, and public housing/assisted living), administrators, and payors (public, individual, and managed intendance).


Among other problems covered in this TIP is the importance of detoxification every bit one component in the continuum of healthcare services for substance-related disorders. The TIP reinforces the urgent need for nontraditional settings—such equally emergency rooms, medical and surgical wards in hospitals, acute intendance clinics, and others that practise not traditionally provide detoxification services—to exist prepared to participate in the procedure of getting the patient who is in need of detoxification into a program as apace every bit possible to potentially avoid the myriad possible negative consequences associated with substance abuse (east.g., physiological and psychological disturbances/disorders, criminal involvement, unemployment, etc.). Furthermore, it promotes the latest strategies for retaining individuals in detoxification while likewise encouraging the evolution of the therapeutic alliance to promote the patient’s entrance into substance corruption treatment. This includes suggestions on addressing psychosocial issues that may affect detoxification services.

This TIP provides medical information on detoxification protocols for specific substances, as well as considerations for individuals with co-occurring medical conditions including mental disorders. While the TIP is not intended to have the place of medical texts, information technology provides the practitioner with an overview of medical considerations.

This TIP volition also bring clinicians and administrators up-to-date on of import aspects of detoxification, including how the services are to be paid for. It is unusual in a clinical treatment improvement protocol to discuss problems related to how clinical services are reimbursed. However, in the field of substance abuse and detoxification services, reimbursement issues have get then intertwined with the delivery of services that the consensus console deemed it necessary to address the conflicts and misunderstandings that sometimes ascend between the care systems and the reimbursement systems.

History of Detoxification Services

Prior to the 1970s, public intoxication was treated every bit a criminal offense. People arrested for it were held in the “boozer tanks” of local jails where they underwent withdrawal with little or no medical intervention (Abbott et al. 1995; Sadd and Immature 1987). Shifts in the medical field, in perceptions of addiction, and in social policy changed the way that people with dependency on drugs, including booze, were viewed and treated. Ii notable events were particularly instrumental in changing attitudes. In 1958, the American Medical Association (AMA) took the official position that alcoholism is a affliction. This declaration suggested that alcoholism was a medical problem requiring medical intervention. In 1971, the National Briefing of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws adopted the Compatible Alcoholism and Intoxication Treatment Act, which recommended that “alcoholics not be subjected to criminal prosecution considering of their consumption of alcoholic beverages but rather should be afforded a continuum of treatment in lodge that they may atomic number 82 normal lives as productive members of society” (Keller and Rosenberg 1973, p. 2). While this recommendation did not bear the weight of law, it made a major change in the legal implications of habit. With these changes came more humane treatment of people with addictions.

Popular:   What is the Mass of 170 Mol of Carbon-12

Several methods of detoxification take evolved that reverberate a more humanitarian view of people with substance use disorders. In the “medical model,” detoxification is characterized by the utilise of md and nursing staff and the assistants of medication to assist people through withdrawal safely (Sadd and Young 1987). The “social model” rejects the apply of medication and the need for routine medical care, relying instead on a supportive nonhospital environment to ease the passage through withdrawal (Sadd and Young 1987). Today, it is rare to find a “pure” detoxification model. For example, some social model programs use medication to ease withdrawal simply more often than not employ nonmedical staff to monitor withdrawal and carry triage (i.east., sorting patients co-ordinate to the severity of their disorders). Likewise, medical programs more often than not have some components to address social/personal aspects of addiction.

Just as the treatment and the conceptualization of addiction have changed, so too have the patterns of substance use and the accompanying detoxification needs. The popularity of cocaine, heroin, and other substances has led to the need for different kinds of detoxification services. At the aforementioned time, public wellness officials take increased investments in detoxification services and substance abuse treatment, especially subsequently 1985, as a means to inhibit the spread of HIV infection and AIDS amidst people who inject drugs. More recently, people with substance apply disorders are more likely to corruption more than one drug simultaneously (i.e., polydrug abuse) (Function of Applied Studies 2005).

The AMA’due south position is that substance dependence is a disease, and information technology encourages physicians and other clinicians, health organizations, and policymakers to base all their activities on this premise.

The AMA continues to maintain its position that substance dependence is a disease, and it encourages physicians and other clinicians, health organizations, and policymakers to base all their activities on this premise (AMA 2002). As treatment regimens have become more sophisticated and polydrug abuse more common, detoxification has evolved into a compassionate science.


Few clear definitions of detoxification and related concepts are in general utilise at this fourth dimension. Criminal justice, health intendance, substance abuse, mental wellness, and many other systems all define detoxification differently. This TIP offers a clear and compatible set up of definitions for the diverse components of detoxification and substance corruption treatment that may prove useful to the field of detoxification.


Detoxification is a set of interventions aimed at managing acute intoxication and withdrawal. It denotes a clearing of toxins from the body of the patient who is acutely intoxicated and/or dependent on substances of abuse. Detoxification seeks to minimize the physical damage caused past the abuse of substances. The acute medical management of life-threatening intoxication and related medical problems generally is not included within the term
and is non covered in item in this TIP.

The Washington Circle Group (WCG), a body of experts organized to improve the quality and effectiveness of substance abuse prevention and treatment, defines detoxification as “a medical intervention that manages an individual safely through the process of acute withdrawal” (McCorry et al. 2000a, p. 9). The WCG makes an important distinction, still, in noting that “a detoxification program is not designed to resolve the longstanding psychological, social, and behavioral problems associated with alcohol and drug abuse” (McCorry et al. 2000a, p. nine). The consensus console supports this statement and has taken special intendance to annotation that
detoxification is not substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation. For further explanation, meet the text box below.


Detoxification as Distinct From Substance Abuse Handling.

The consensus panel built on existing definitions of detoxification equally a wide process with three essential components that may take identify concurrently or as a series of steps:

entails testing for the presence of substances of abuse in the bloodstream, measuring their concentration, and screening for co-occurring mental and physical conditions. Evaluation besides includes a comprehensive assessment of the patient’s medical and psychological conditions and social situation to aid determine the advisable level of treatment following detoxification. Substantially, the evaluation serves as the footing for the initial substance abuse treatment plan one time the patient has been withdrawn successfully.

includes the medical and psychosocial processes of assisting the patient through acute intoxication and withdrawal to the attainment of a medically stable, fully supported, substance-gratis state. This often is done with the assistance of medications, though in some approaches to detoxification no medication is used. Stabilization includes familiarizing patients with what to expect in the treatment milieu and their part in treatment and recovery. During this time practitioners also seek the involvement of the patient’s family unit, employers, and other significant people when appropriate and with release of confidentiality.

Fostering the patient’s entry into treatment
involves preparing the patient for entry into substance abuse handling by stressing the importance of post-obit through with the complete substance abuse treatment continuum of intendance. For patients who have demonstrated a pattern of completing detoxification services and and then failing to engage in substance abuse handling, a written handling contract may encourage entrance into a continuum of substance abuse handling and care. This contract, which is not legally binding, is voluntarily signed by patients when they are stable enough to practice so at the beginning of treatment. In it, the patient agrees to participate in a continuing care program, with details and contacts established prior to the completion of detoxification.

Popular:   Which of the Following is a Valid Probability Distribution

All three components (evaluation, stabilization, and fostering a patient’south entry into treatment) involve treating the patient with pity and agreement. Patients undergoing detoxification need to know that someone cares well-nigh them, respects them equally individuals, and has hope for their future. Deportment taken during detoxification will demonstrate to the patient that the provider’due south recommendations can be trusted and followed.

Other Relevant Terms

Equally defined past the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, quaternary edition, Text Revision
(DSM-4-TR) (American Psychiatric Association [APA] 2000), a
substance-related disorder
is a “disorder related to the taking of a drug of abuse (including alcohol), to the side effects of a medication, and to toxin exposure” (APA 2000, p. 191). The term substance “can refer to a drug of abuse, a medication, or a toxin” (APA 2000, p. 191). In this TIP, the term
refers to booze as well every bit other drugs of corruption.

Substance-related disorders are divided into two groups: substance apply disorders and substance-induced disorders. According to the DSM-IV-TR,
substance utilize disorders
include both “substance dependence” and “substance corruption.”
Substance dependence
refers to “a cluster of cognitive, behavioral, and physiological symptoms indicating that the private continues employ of the substance despite significant substance-related problems. In that location is a pattern of repeated self-administration that can result in tolerance, withdrawal, and compulsive drug-taking behavior” (APA 2000, p. 192).
Substance abuse
refers to “a maladaptive pattern of substance use manifested by recurrent and meaning adverse consequences related to the repeated utilise of substances” (APA 2000, p. 198). Information technology should be noted that for purposes of this TIP, the term “substance abuse” is sometimes used to denote both
substance abuse
substance dependence
as they are defined by the DSM-IV-TR.

This TIP besides uses the DSM-4-TR definitions for
substance intoxication
substance withdrawal.
Substance intoxication
is “the development of a reversible substance-specific syndrome due to the recent ingestion of (or exposure to) a substance” whereas
substance withdrawal
is “the development of a substance-specific maladaptive behavioral alter, with physiological and cognitive concomitants, that is due to the abeyance of, or reduction in, heavy and prolonged substance use” (APA 2000, pp. 199, 201). Figure 1-1 (p. 6) defines these and other relevant terms.

includes an ongoing, continual cess of the patient’s concrete, psychological, and social status, too every bit an analysis of environmental adventure factors that may be contributing to substance use and the identification of immediate relapse triggers as well equally prevention strategies for coping with them. Information technology also includes the commitment of primary medical care and psychiatric care, if necessary, to assistance the patient abstain from substance use and minimize the physical impairment caused by information technology. Ultimately, the goal of treatment/rehabilitation is to attain a higher level of social functioning by reducing risk factors, enhancing protective factors, and thus decreasing the possibility of relapse.

includes the continuation of counseling and support specified in the handling plan, refinement and strengthening of strategies to avoid relapse, and engagement in ongoing relapse prevention, aftercare, and/or domiciliary intendance (Lehman et al. 2000).

As a final note, in this TIP persons in demand of detoxification services and subsequent substance corruption treatment are referred to as patients to emphasize that these persons are coming into contact with physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and medical social workers in a medical setting in which the patient ofttimes is physically ill from the furnishings of withdrawal from specific substances. In some social setting detoxification programs, the terms “customer” or “consumer” may be used in identify of “patient.”

Popular:   A Solution Containing Hcl Would Likely Have

Guiding Principles in Detoxification and Substance Abuse Treatment

The consensus panel recognizes that the successful delivery of detoxification services is dependent on standards that are to some extent empirically measurable and agreed upon by all parties. The consensus console developed guidelines (listed in Effigy i-2) that serve as the foundation for the TIP.

Figure one-two

Guiding Principles Recognized by the Consensus Console.

Challenges to Providing Effective Detoxification

Information technology is an important challenge for detoxification service providers to detect the most effective way to foster a patient’southward recovery. Constructive detoxification includes not merely the medical stabilization of the patient and the safe and humane withdrawal from drugs, including alcohol, but also entry into treatment. Successfully linking detoxification with substance abuse treatment reduces the “revolving door” phenomenon of repeated withdrawals, saves money in the medium and long run, and delivers the sound and humane level of care patients demand (Kertesz et al. 2003). Studies show that detoxification and its linkage to the appropriate levels of treatment lead to increased recovery and decreased use of detoxification and treatment services in the hereafter. In add-on, recovery leads to reductions in offense, full general healthcare costs, and expensive acute medical and surgical treatments consequent to untreated substance corruption (Abbot et al. 1998; Aszalos et al. 1999). While detoxification is not treatment per se, its effectiveness can exist measured, in office, by the patient’s continued abstinence.

Another challenge to providing constructive detoxification occurs when programs try to develop linkages to treatment services. A report (Mark et al. 2002) conducted for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration highlights the pitfalls of the service delivery organization. Co-ordinate to the authors, each twelvemonth at least 300,000 patients with substance utilise disorders or acute intoxication obtain inpatient detoxification in general hospitals while additional numbers obtain detoxification in other settings. Merely about one-fifth of people discharged from acute care hospitals for detoxification receive substance abuse treatment during that hospitalization. Moreover, only 15 percent of people who are admitted through an emergency room for detoxification and and so discharged receive any substance abuse treatment.

Finally the average length of stay for people undergoing detoxification and treatment in 1997 was only 7.7 days (Mark et al. 2002). Given that “inquiry has shown that patients who receive continuing care have ameliorate outcomes in terms of drug forbearance and readmission rates than those who do not receive continuing care,” the report authors conclude that there is a pronounced need for better linkage betwixt detoxification services and the treatment services that are essential for full recovery (Mark et al. 2002, p. 3).

Reimbursement systems can nowadays another claiming to providing effective detoxification services (Galanter et al. 2000). Third-party payors sometimes adopt to manage payment for detoxification separately from other phases of addiction treatment, thus treating detoxification every bit if information technology occurred in isolation from habit treatment. This “unbundling” of services has promoted the separation of all services into somewhat scattered segments (Kasser et al. 2000). In other instances, some reimbursement and utilization policies dictate that only “detoxification” currently can be authorized, and “detoxification” for that policy or insurer does not cover the nonmedical counseling that is an integral part of substance abuse treatment. Many handling programs have found substance abuse counselors to exist of special help with resistant patients, specially for patients with severe underlying shame over the fact that their substance use is out of command. Yet some payors will not reimburse for nonmedical services such as those provided by these counselors, and therefore the apply of such staff by a detoxification or handling service may be impossible, in spite of the fact that they are widely perceived as useful for patients.

Payors are gradually beginning to understand that detoxification is only one component of a comprehensive treatment strategy. Patient placement criteria, such as those published by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) in the
Patient Placement Criteria, Second Edition, Revised
(ASAM 2001), take come to the fore every bit clinicians and insurers try to reach agreements on the level of treatment required by a given patient, as well every bit the medically appropriate setting in which the treatment services are to be delivered. Accordingly, the TIP offers suggestions for resolving conflicts as well as clearly defining terms used in patient placement and treatment settings as a step toward clearer agreement among interested parties.

Explain the Concept of Withdrawal as It Relates to Medication

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64119/